Monday, 19 January 2015

ONBOARD COMPLIANT PROCEDURE ON INDIAN SHIPS AS PER MLC-2006



ONBOARD COMPLIANT PROCEDURE ON INDIAN SHIPS AS PER MLC-2006


AS PER MLC 2006 ALL SHIP OWNERS HAS A FORMAL ONBOARD COMPLIANT PROCEDURE SYSTEM WHICH SHOULD DESIGNED TO RESOLVE COMPLAINTS AT LOWEST LEVEL AND DOES NOT PREVENT A SEAFARER TO MAKE A COMPLIANT DIRECTLY TO THE MASTER,SHIP OWNER OR DIRECTOR GENERAL OFFICE IF NECESSARY
THE COMPLIANT SYSTEM SHOULD SAFEGUARD AGAINST VICTIMIZATION AND COMPLIANT MUST ACCOMPANIED OR REPRESENTED DURING THE PROCEDURE
THE COMPLIANT ADDRESSED TO HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OR SUPERIOR OFFICER AND THE COMPLIANT DEALT WITHIN 3 DAYS IF NOT RESOLVED REFERRED TO THE MASTER.  MASTER TO BE DEALT WITHIN 7 DAYS.  WITH RECORD AND COPY TO SEAFARER
ALL COMPLAINTS AND DECISIONS ON THE COMPLIANCE SHALL BE RECORDED IN OFFICIAL LOG BOOK AND A COPY OF THE DECISION TAKEN ,IN EVERY CASE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE SEAFARER BY RESOLVING AUTHORITY.CONTACT DETAILS OF THE SHIP OWNER  FOR RESOLVING COMPLAINTS AND ADDRESS OF GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM FOR INDIAN SEAFARERS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE ONBOARD
IF NOT RESOLVED ONBOARD, REFEREED TO THE SHIP OWNER OR HIS REPRESENTATIVE WHERE TO BE RESOLVED WITHIN ONE MONTH.(ON RECEIPT OF COMPLIANT) FOR RESOLVING THE SHIP OWNER CAN USE THE ASSISTANCE OF THE COMMITTEE  SETUP FOR IT AND COMPRISING THE SEAFARERS UNION ALSO
IF THE COMPLIANT OF THE SEAFARER IS NOT RESOLVED BY OWNER/MANAGER WITHIN 1 MONTH. THE SEAFARER HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPROACH THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY THROUGH THE GRIEVANCE REDRESSEL MECHANISM SET UP BY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF SHIPPING INDIA
A SEAFARER ON BOARD VESSEL AT FOREIGN PORT IN BETWEEN A VOYAGE HAVE RIGHT TO SEPARATELY REPORT HIS COMPLAINTS TO THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AT THAT PORT UNDER THE MLC ONSHORE SEAFARER COMPLAINT  HANDLING PROCEDURE
ANY SEAFARER MAY SUBMIT HIS GRIEVANCE ,IN WRITING TO THE JURISDICTIONAL DESIGNATED GRIEVANCE OFFICERS APPOINTED BY DG SHIPPING AFTER TAKING UP THE SAME WITH HIS COMPANY OR MANAGERS, ALONG WITH COPY OF HIS COMPLIANT AND REPLY RECEIVED.THE GRIEVANCE FORMALLY REGISTERED AND RECORDED AND THEN AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND REGISTRATION NO. IS ACKNOWLEDGED TO SEAFARER THROUGH SPEED POST WITHIN THREE WORKING DAYS OF THE RECEIPT OF THE GRIEVANCE. THE DESIGNATED GRIEVANCE REDRESSEL OFFICER MAY TRANSFER SUCH GRIEVANCE NOT UNDER HIS JURISDICTION TO THE CONCERNED OFFICER WITHIN THREE DAYS OF THE RECEIPT AND A FORMAL INTIMATION TO SEAFARER BY SPEED POST ACKNOWLEDGE.
THE DESIGNATED GRIEVANCE REDRESSEL OFFICER SHALL ATTEND TO THE GRIEVANCE AND DISPOSE THE SAME NOT EXCEEDING THIRTY WORKING DAYS OF RECEIPT.
FIRST APPEAL
                THE SEAFARER NOT SATISFIED WITH THE DECISION OF THE DESIGNATED GRIEVANCE REDRESSEL OFFICER,  CAN  SUBMIT AN APPEAL TO FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY (FAA,JURISDICTIONAL  PRINCIPAL OFFICER MMD)OF HIS LOCATION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE RECEIPT OF SUCH DECISION.AFTER THE EXPIRY OF THIRTY DAYS FAA MAY ADMIT APPEAL, THE SEAFARER HAVE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT AND REASONABLE CAUSE ON RECORD FOR FILING AN APPEAL IN TIME
                AN APPEAL SHOULD BE DISPOSED OF NOT LATER THAN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF AN APPEAL OR WITHIN SUCH EXTENDED PERIOD NOT EXCEEDING A TOTAL OF SIXTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING/RECEIPT
SECOND APPEAL
                THE SEAFARER NOT SATISFIED BY ORDER OF FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY CAN APPEAL TO THE SECOND APPELLATE AUTHORITY(SAA),A DESIGNATED OFFICER IN THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SHIPPING(DGS),GOVERNMENT OF THE INDIA,MUMBAI. WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF RECEIPT OF SUCH DECISION.
                THE DGS MAY ADMIT AN APPEAL AFTER THE EXPIRY OF THE PERIOD OF THIRTY DAYS BUT NOT LATER THAN SIXTY DAYS BUT APPELLANT SHOULD PROVIDE SUFFICIENT AND REASONABLE CAUSE FOR FILING AN APPEAL IN TIME
                THE DECISION OF THE DGS SHALL BE FINAL AND BINDING ON THE   SEAFARER
               

Saturday, 17 January 2015

ISM AUDITS SAFETY MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATE





ISM AUDIT SMC


TYPES OF AUDIT SMC
1. interim audit
2. initial audit
3. intermediate  audit
4. renewal  audit
5. additional audit

Interim audit
                Company in possession of interim DOC or DOC is eligible to apply for interim SMC audit for ship when takes on responsibility for the operation of  the ship, that  is ship is new to the company
                Satisfactory compleation of audit issue a short term SMC for 3 months by RO and after scrutiny of report dg shipping issues SMC for 6 months

Initial audit
                Company possession of DOC (not interim) and having implemented SMC onboard the ship for at least 3 months eligible to apply for initial SMC audit of the ship after satisfactory compleation of initial SMC audit  RO issues SMC valid for 5 months, after scrutiny of audit report dg shipping issues SMC for not exceeding 5 years

Intermediate audit
                Company should apply for intermediate SMC and of their vessel to maintain the validity of  SMC. The SMC audit is required to be carried out between second and third anniversary date of SMC
                Endorse the SMC for intermediate  audit

Renewal audit
                Renewal verification audit before the expiry of validity of the existing SMC for obtaining fresh SMC preferably when the window period (six months prior expiry of SMC)

Additional audit
                Company in possession of interim SMC or SMC  for their ships is require to apply for additional audit on imposition  by audit team or dg shipping .the audit team endorses the SMC  for additional verification on satisfactory  compleation of audit

ISM AUDITS DOC






         
DOC AUDITS

TYPES OF AUDIT FOR D.O.C.
      1.       Interim audit
      2.       Initial audit
      3.       Annual audit
      4.       Renewal audit
      5.       Additional  audit
      6.       Surveillance audit

Interim audit   
An interim DOC is issued to facilitate initial implementation of ism code
      a)     Newly established company
      b)      When new ship types are added to an existing DOC
DG shipping issues 12 months interim DOC issues after getting satisfactory audit report

Initial audit
                The company is eligible to apply for initial DOC audit  on implementation of SMS for at least 3 months on the vessel and  in company
                The dg shipping issues DOC for 5years after receipt of initial audit

Annual audit
Companies in possession of DOC are required  to apply for annual verification audit within 3 months before or after each anniversary date of validity endorsed DOC for annual verification

Renewal audit
                Renewal audit before the expiry of validity of the DOC for obtaining fresh DOC
Issues 5 years DOC after the satisfactory audit by dg shipping

Additional audit
                Company in possession of DOC are required to apply for additional DOC audit whe
        A)     change of company name
        B)      shifting of office location
        C)      imposed by audit team or dg shipping
        D)     complete revision of sms manual
Endorses DOC additional verification

Surveillance audit
Companies in possession of interim DOC valid for 12 months but were unable to obtain management of ship during period of validity can apply for surveillance DOC.  Audit prior to their expiry of interim DOC to re validate their existing interim DOC beyond 12 months
Dg shipping issued interim DOC for a maximum period of 12 months on a receipt of audit

Monday, 1 December 2014

FLAG OF CONVENIENCE


                                            FLAG OF CONVENIENCE

            Flag of convenience (FOC) also known as "flag of necessity"
 A flag of convenience ship is one that flies the flag of a country other than the country of ownership
FOC
1) Whether the country allows non citizens to own and control vessels.
2) Whether access to and transfer from the registry is easy.
3) Whether taxes on shipping income are low r non existent.
4) Whether the country of registration does not need the shipping tonnage for its own purposes but is keen to          
     earn the tonnage fees.
5) Whether manning by non-nationals is freely permitted.
6) Whether country lacks the power (or the willingness) to impose national or international regulations on the
      ship owner using its flag.
        In defining an FOC register, the ITF takes as the most important factor whether the nationality of the ship owner is the same as the nationality of the flag.

  the flag of convenience affects the standards of shipping all the way. 
 Some of these registers have poor safety and training standards, and place no restriction on the nationality of the crew. Sometimes, because of language differences, seafarers are not able to communicate effectively with each other, putting safety and the efficient operation of the ship at risk.
In many cases these flags are not even run from the country concerned.
Once a ship is registered under an FOC many shipowners then recruit the cheapest labour they can find, pay minimal wages and cut costs by lowering standards of living and working conditions for the crew.

THE FOC VESSELS
MANY OF FOC VESSELS ARE

1. UNSAFE
 Many FOC vessels are older than the average age and badly maintained
2. UNPROTECTED
 Poor safety practices andAccidents are frequent, but for many shipowners the delivery of cargoes and the costs of any delay are their only concerns.
3.Unpaid
  The  crews owed large sums of money. Some crews simply aren't paid. Those that are sometimes find that companies delay, or fail to make, payments to their families when they want to send money home. In many cases months go by without any sign of money promised to seafarers. With no pay they cannot even afford to escape and make their own way home.
4.Insecure
the terrorist organisations can own and operate ships under the FOC system with impunity. Arms smuggling, the ability to conceal large sums of money, trafficking in goods and people, and other illegal activities can also thrive in the unregulated havens which the FOC system provides.

 using below link of itf the seafarer can find out the vessel and its itf agreements
http://seafarers.oxfordwebapps.com/find-vessel


Current Registries Listed as FOCs

The following 34 countries have been declared FOCs by the ITF's Fair Practices Committee (a joint committee of ITF seafarers' and dockers' unions), which runs the ITF campaign against FOCs:
  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Bahamas
  • Barbados
  • Belize
  • Bermuda (UK)
  • Bolivia
  • Burma
  • Cambodia
  • Cayman Islands
  • Comoros
  • Cyprus
  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Faroe Islands (FAS)
  • French International Ship Register (FIS)
  • German International Ship Register (GIS)
  • Georgia
  • Gibraltar (UK)
  • Honduras
  • Jamaica
  • Lebanon
  • Liberia
  • Malta
  • Marshall Islands (USA)
  • Mauritius
  • Moldova
  • Mongolia
  • Netherlands Antilles
  • North Korea
  • Panama
  • Sao Tome and Príncipe
  • St Vincent
  • Sri Lanka
  • Tonga
  • Vanuatu
 all datas are taken from itf website
http://www.itfseafarers.org/focs-to-seafarers.cfm